Birkenstock Loses Copyright Art Case
Analysis based on 7 articles · First reported Feb 20, 2025 · Last updated Feb 21, 2025
The ruling by the Germany — Federal Court of Justice against Birkenstock's claim for copyright protection on its sandals could negatively impact Birkenstock's brand value and intellectual property strategy, potentially making it harder to combat copycat products. This decision sets a precedent in German law regarding applied art and consumer products, which may influence other companies in the footwear and apparel industries.
Germany's Germany — Federal Court of Justice ruled that Birkenstock's sandals cannot be considered copyright-protected works of applied art. Birkenstock had filed a lawsuit against three unnamed competitors for selling similar sandals, arguing that its designs deserved stronger intellectual property protection. While a regional court in Germany — Cologne initially sided with Birkenstock, Germany — Cologne's higher regional court overturned the decision, stating it found no artistic achievement in the sandals. The Germany — Federal Court of Justice upheld the appeals court's ruling, emphasizing that a product cannot be copyrighted if its design is primarily determined by technical requirements or functionality rather than individuality. This decision has implications for intellectual property law in Germany, particularly for consumer products.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard