Disney, Universal Sue Midjourney for Copyright
Analysis based on 22 articles · First reported Jun 11, 2025 · Last updated Jun 12, 2025
This lawsuit by The Walt Disney Company and Comcast — NBCUniversal against Midjourney signals a significant legal challenge for the generative AI industry, potentially leading to increased regulatory scrutiny and demands for licensing agreements for AI training data. It could impact the valuation and operational models of AI companies, while potentially bolstering the intellectual property rights and market positions of content creators in the entertainment sector.
The Walt Disney Company and Comcast — NBCUniversal have jointly filed a lawsuit against Midjourney, a generative AI image platform, in a Los Angeles federal court, alleging massive copyright infringement. The lawsuit claims that Midjourney illegally trained its AI on the studios' copyrighted libraries, enabling it to generate images of iconic characters like Darth Vader and Elsa without permission or licensing. The studios argue that Midjourney is a 'bottomless pit of plagiarism' and a 'copyright free-rider,' threatening the foundational incentives of U.S. copyright law. Midjourney's founder, David Holz, is cited for previously admitting the company does not seek consent from copyright holders for its training data. The plaintiffs are seeking up to $20 million in damages and an injunction to stop Midjourney from generating infringing images. This marks the first major Hollywood studio lawsuit against an AI company, with potential broad implications for the generative AI field, which has already seen similar lawsuits against OpenAI and Meta Platforms from other content creators like The New York Times and Ziff Davis.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard