Nirvana 'Nevermind' Lawsuit Dismissed Again
Analysis based on 6 articles · First reported Oct 02, 2025 · Last updated Oct 04, 2025
The dismissal of the lawsuit against Nirvana removes a significant legal and reputational risk for the band and its associated entities like Universal Music Group. This outcome is generally positive for the entertainment industry, reinforcing legal precedents regarding artistic expression and potentially deterring similar claims.
A lawsuit filed by Nevermind, who appeared as a naked baby on Nirvana's 'Nevermind' album cover, has been dismissed for the second time by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Elden claimed the image constituted child pornography and sought damages from Nirvana's surviving members Dave Grohl and Krist Novoselic, Kurt Cobain's widow Courtney Love, and photographer Kirk Weddle. Judge Olguin ruled that no reasonable jury would consider the image pornographic, likening it to a 'family photo of a nude child bathing'. The case was initially dismissed in 2022 on time-barred grounds but was reinstated by the United States — United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2023, leading to this second dismissal on the merits of the allegations. Nirvana's lawyer Bert Deixler expressed satisfaction with the ruling, while Elden's legal team plans to appeal.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard