Smucker Sues Trader Joe's Over Uncrustables
Analysis based on 8 articles · First reported Oct 14, 2025 · Last updated Oct 16, 2025
The lawsuit by The J.M. Smucker Company against Trader Joe s could set a precedent for intellectual property protection in the food industry, potentially affecting how other companies design and market their private-label products. A favorable outcome for The J.M. Smucker Company could strengthen brand owners' ability to combat alleged copycat products, while a loss might encourage more private-label imitations.
The J.M. Smucker Company has filed a lawsuit against Trader Joe s, alleging trademark infringement and deceptive trade practices. The lawsuit claims that Trader Joe s new frozen peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, described as 'Crustless Peanut Butter & Strawberry Jam Sandwiches,' are an 'obvious copycat' of The J.M. Smucker Company's popular Uncrustables brand. The J.M. Smucker Company asserts that Trader Joe s product mimics Uncrustables' unique round, crustless design with crimped edges, as well as its packaging, which features a similar blue color and an image of a sandwich with a bite taken out. The J.M. Smucker Company, which has invested over $1 billion in developing the Uncrustables brand, argues that Trader Joe s is attempting to capitalize on its goodwill and substantial investment, leading to consumer confusion. The company is seeking unspecified monetary damages, a court order to prevent Trader Joe s from using similar branding, and the destruction of all infringing products and marketing materials. Trader Joe s has not yet commented on the lawsuit. This legal action follows a similar cease and desist letter sent by The J.M. Smucker Company to Gallant Tiger in 2022 and a recent lawsuit by Mondelez International against Aldi over packaging similarities.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard