Immigration Agents Use Banned Chokeholds
Analysis based on 6 articles · First reported Jan 13, 2026 · Last updated Jan 17, 2026
This event primarily concerns human rights and government accountability, with limited direct financial market impact. However, the legal challenges against United States — California and United States — Illinois by the Trump administration could create regulatory uncertainty for states attempting to legislate on federal immigration enforcement, potentially affecting state-level governance and legal costs.
Immigration agents from United States — United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and United States — United States Border Patrol are reportedly using banned chokeholds, carotid restraints, and other dangerous tactics on civilians, including citizens, immigrants, and protesters, across the United States. These actions, which can restrict breathing and blood flow, have led to injuries, unconsciousness, and even death, as in the case of Killing of Renée Good. Despite a 2023 ban by the United States — United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on such tactics, ProPublica found over 40 cases in the past year. High-profile incidents include Arnoldo Bazan, a 16-year-old citizen, and Carlos Sebastian Zapata Rivera, who suffered seizures. The United States — White House and DHS officials, including Kristi Noem and Abigail Becker, have defended the agents' conduct, claiming they followed training. This has sparked outrage and led to legal and legislative efforts in states like United States — California, United States — Illinois, United States — Colorado, and United States — Minnesota to hold federal agents accountable, with the Trump administration challenging these state laws.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard