India TB Regimen Cost-Effective Study
Analysis based on 6 articles · First reported Feb 12, 2026 · Last updated Feb 13, 2026
The study's findings are positive for the healthcare and pharmaceutical markets, particularly in India, as the adoption of Bedaquiline-based regimens (BPaL and BPaLM) could lead to improved public health outcomes and more efficient resource allocation for the India — National Malaria Elimination Programme. This could increase demand for the drugs involved, benefiting their manufacturers.
A study conducted by the India — Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and its National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis found that shorter, six-month all-oral treatment regimens for multidrug-resistant and rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) are cost-effective and offer improved health outcomes compared to longer regimens currently used in India. The economic evaluation, published in the Indian Journal of Medical Research, assessed bedaquiline-based regimens, specifically BPaL (bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid) and BPaLM (with moxifloxacin), against existing 9-11 month and 18-20 month bedaquiline-containing treatments under the India — National Malaria Elimination Programme (NTEP). The BPaL regimen was found to be more effective and cost-saving, reducing health system spending by INR 379 per patient per additional Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY). The BPaLM regimen was also highly cost-effective, with an additional expenditure of only INR 37 per patient per additional QALY. Both regimens are associated with lower or comparable overall healthcare costs, including medicines, hospital visits, and follow-up care. These findings provide economic evidence to support the programmatic adoption of BPaL-based regimens under the NTEP, aligning with India's national priorities to optimize resource utilization and accelerate TB elimination.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard