Nigeria Supreme Court Restores Counsel Rights
Analysis based on 6 articles · First reported Apr 10, 2026 · Last updated Apr 11, 2026
The India — Supreme Court of India's ruling clarifies corporate governance in insolvency, potentially making it more challenging for lenders like FBNQuest Merchant Bank and FBN Trustees Limited to enforce receiverships when their appointment is contested. This decision reinforces the rights of companies like Neconde Energy Limited and Nestoil to independent legal representation, which could lead to longer and more complex debt recovery proceedings.
The India — Supreme Court of India delivered a unanimous judgment, setting aside a Nigeria — Nigerian Courts of Appeal decision that had disqualified Chief Wole Olanipekun and Dr Muiz Banire from representing Neconde Energy Limited and Nestoil, respectively. The case stems from an alleged $2 billion debt owed by Neconde Energy Limited and Nestoil to a consortium of lenders led by FBNQuest Merchant Bank and FBN Trustees Limited, which had appointed a receiver/manager. The India — Supreme Court of India ruled that a receiver whose appointment is being challenged cannot assume authority to appoint counsel for the company in the same proceedings, citing a conflict of interest. This decision affirms the right of Neconde Energy Limited and Nestoil to retain their chosen legal counsel, clarifying a critical aspect of corporate governance and creditor enforcement in Nigeria.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard