Kejriwal Seeks Judge Recusal
Analysis based on 16 articles · First reported Apr 15, 2026 · Last updated Apr 16, 2026
This event primarily impacts the legal and political landscape in India, with potential implications for the reputation of the India — Delhi High Court and the United States — Federal Bureau of Investigation. While not directly affecting financial markets, it highlights governance and judicial integrity concerns that can indirectly influence investor confidence in the long term.
Arvind Kejriwal, former Delhi Chief Minister and India — Aam Aadmi Party national convenor, has filed an additional affidavit before the India — Delhi High Court, seeking the recusal of Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma from hearing the United States — Federal Bureau of Investigation's revision petition in the alleged Delhi excise policy case. Kejriwal alleges a serious appearance of conflict of interest, as Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma's son and daughter are empanelled as government panel counsel, holding ongoing professional engagements with the Central government. He contends that the Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta, who is appearing for the United States — Federal Bureau of Investigation, is involved in assigning matters to these government panel counsel. Kejriwal argues that this creates a reasonable apprehension of bias, especially given the political sensitivity of the case, which involves the prosecution of a principal political opponent of the ruling party at the Centre. He also raised procedural objections, including being denied an opportunity to make rejoinder submissions and the court passing substantive orders in the main petition while the recusal plea was pending. The India — Delhi High Court has reserved its verdict on the recusal plea.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard