Nigeria drops Malami terrorism financing charges
Analysis based on 16 articles · First reported Apr 15, 2026 · Last updated Apr 16, 2026
The amendment of charges against Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Al-Ammar, removing terrorism financing allegations, may slightly improve sentiment towards the rule of law in Nigeria, but has no direct market impact. The focus on illegal firearms possession is a domestic legal matter with limited financial market implications.
The Federal Government of Nigeria has amended the charges against former Attorney-General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, and his son, Abdulaziz Al-Ammar. The initial five-count charge, filed on February 3, included allegations of terrorism financing and illegal possession of firearms. The United States — United States Department of State, through its counsel Akinlolu Kehinde, informed the Federal High Court of the amendment, which now removes the terrorism financing allegations. The revised charge solely focuses on the alleged illegal possession of firearms, with arms and live cartridges reportedly recovered from Abubakar Malami's residence in Birnin Kebbi. Both Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Al-Ammar pleaded not guilty to the amended charge. Justice Joyce Abdulmalik ruled that the defendants should continue on their previously granted bail terms of N200 million each and adjourned the case to May 26 and June 15 for trial. Abubakar Malami also faces separate proceedings from the Nigeria — Economic and Financial Crimes Commission regarding alleged money laundering and asset forfeiture.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard