Snapshot from Jul 19, 2026 at 14:14 UTC. For live data and tracking: View Live
Events / Business / Phreesia Securities Fraud Class Actions
Business class action lawsuit

Phreesia Securities Fraud Class Actions

Analysis based on 303 articles · First reported Apr 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 05, 2026

Sentiment
-70
Attention
7
Articles
303
Market Impact
General
Live prominence charts, article sentiment distribution, and event development timeline available on the Ergen Dashboard
Market Impact

The multiple class action lawsuits against Phreesia for alleged securities fraud have negatively impacted investor confidence, leading to a significant drop in Phreesia's stock price. The ongoing legal proceedings and the allegations of misleading statements regarding revenue projections and weakened pharmaceutical marketing commitments are likely to cause continued volatility and uncertainty for Phreesia's stock.

Healthcare Technology Pharmaceuticals Legal Services
Event Summary

Multiple law firms, including The Schall Law Firm, Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, Pomerantz LLP, Glancy Prongay & Murray, DJS Law Group, Rosen Law Firm, The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz, and Faruqi & Faruqi, have announced or filed class action lawsuits against Phreesia, Inc. The lawsuits allege that Phreesia made false and misleading statements to investors between May 8, 2025, and March 30, 2026. Specifically, the complaints claim that Phreesia misrepresented its long-term growth outlook and confidence in fiscal year 2027 revenue projections, while downplaying risks from slowing demand and weakened pharmaceutical marketing commitments in its Network Solutions segment. Following Phreesia's announcement of significantly reduced revenue growth projections on March 30, 2026, its stock price fell by 26.56%. Investors who purchased Phreesia securities during the specified period are being encouraged to join these lawsuits, with a lead plaintiff deadline of July 13, 2026.

Key Actions
100 Kirby McInerney LLP filed class action lawsuit Phreesia
95 Pomerantz LLP filed class action lawsuit Phreesia
95 Robbins LLP filed class action Phreesia
94 Phreesia made misleading statements
90 Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC filed class action lawsuit Phreesia
90 Levi & Korsinsky filed class action lawsuit Phreesia
88 Rosen Law Firm announced class action lawsuit Phreesia
88 Phreesia announced reduced projections
87 Faruqi & Faruqi filed class action Phreesia
85 Glancy Prongay & Murray commenced investigation Phreesia
85 Glancy Prongay & Murray reminds investors Phreesia
85 Rosen Law Firm reminds purchasers Phreesia
80 The Schall Law Firm filed class action lawsuit Phreesia
80 The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz filed class action Phreesia
80 DJS Law Group filed class action lawsuit Phreesia
+ 5 more actions View on Dashboard
Entities Involved
stock
Phreesia
Phreesia is the defendant in multiple class action lawsuits alleging securities fraud due to misleading statements about its revenue growth projections and weakened pharmaceutical marketing commitments. Its stock price fell significantly after the announcement of reduced guidance.
Importance 100.0 Sentiment -70.0
priv
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC filed a class action lawsuit against Phreesia, alleging the company made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and prospects.
Importance 90.0 Sentiment 60.0
priv
Pomerantz LLP
Pomerantz LLP filed multiple class action lawsuits against Phreesia, alleging securities fraud and other unlawful business practices after the company announced reduced revenue growth projections.
Importance 90.0 Sentiment 60.0
priv
The Schall Law Firm
The Schall Law Firm filed a class action lawsuit against Phreesia for alleged violations of federal securities laws, representing investors who suffered losses.
Importance 90.0 Sentiment 60.0
priv
Glancy Prongay & Murray
Glancy Prongay & Murray reminds investors of the deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action lawsuit against Phreesia for alleged securities law violations.
Importance 85.0 Sentiment 55.0
priv
Rosen Law Firm
Rosen Law Firm reminds purchasers of Phreesia common stock of the lead plaintiff deadline in the class action lawsuit, alleging false and misleading statements by Phreesia.
Importance 85.0 Sentiment 55.0
priv
Robbins LLP
Robbins LLP is a law firm representing investors in the class action lawsuit against Phreesia, aiming to help shareholders recover losses and hold company executives accountable.
Importance 80.0 Sentiment 60.0
priv
DJS Law Group
The DJS Law Group reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against Phreesia for alleged violations of federal securities laws, citing false and misleading statements about revenue guidance.
Importance 80.0 Sentiment 55.0
priv
The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz
The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz announces that investors with losses related to Phreesia have the opportunity to lead the securities fraud class action lawsuit.
Importance 80.0 Sentiment 55.0
priv
Levi & Korsinsky
Levi & Korsinsky is the law firm representing investors in the class action lawsuit against Phreesia, seeking to recover damages for shareholders. The firm's business benefits from initiating and managing such litigation.
Importance 80.0 Sentiment 70.0
priv
Faruqi & Faruqi
Faruqi & Faruqi is investigating potential claims against Phreesia and reminds investors of the deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action.
Importance 80.0 Sentiment 55.0
priv
Kirby McInerney LLP
Kirby McInerney LLP is the law firm representing investors in the class action lawsuit against Phreesia, actively seeking lead plaintiffs and managing the litigation.
Importance 80.0 Sentiment 60.0
per
Joseph E. Levi
Joseph E. Levi, Esq. is a key contact person at Levi & Korsinsky, actively encouraging investors to join the lawsuit and providing legal counsel. His involvement highlights the firm's efforts in this case.
Importance 70.0 Sentiment 60.0
per
Balaji Gandhi
Balaji Gandhi, as CFO of Phreesia, made statements regarding fiscal year 2027 revenue projections and the contribution of AccessOne, which are now being scrutinized in the lawsuit.
Importance 50.0 Sentiment -40.0
per
Chaim Indig
Chaim Indig, as CEO of Phreesia, made statements about the acquisition of AccessOne and its impact on the addressable market, which are part of the allegations in the lawsuit.
Importance 50.0 Sentiment -40.0
+ 15 more entities View on Dashboard
Relationships
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC co-plaintiffs ↔ Pomerantz LLP Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC frequently collaborates with Pomerantz LLP as co-plaintiffs in numerous class action
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC competitor ↔ The Schall Law Firm Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a shareholder rights litigation firm that directly competes with The Schall Law Fi
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC competitor ↔ Glancy Prongay & Murray Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a plaintiff-side securities litigation firm that directly competes with Glancy Pro
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC competitor ↔ Rosen Law Firm Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a direct competitor to Rosen Law Firm in the plaintiff-side securities class actio
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC co-counsel ↔ Robbins LLP Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC frequently serves as co-counsel with Robbins LLP in numerous securities class action
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC co-plaintiffs ↔ DJS Law Group Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC frequently acts as a co-plaintiff with DJS Law Group in numerous securities fraud cla
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC competitor ↔ The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a plaintiff law firm that directly competes with The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC related ↔ Levi & Korsinsky
Pomerantz LLP competitor ↔ The Schall Law Firm Pomerantz LLP competes directly with The Schall Law Firm to secure lead plaintiff and counsel status in securities fraud
Pomerantz LLP co-counsel ↔ Glancy Prongay & Murray Pomerantz LLP frequently acts as co-counsel with Glancy Prongay & Murray in numerous securities fraud class action lawsu
Pomerantz LLP competitor ↔ Rosen Law Firm Pomerantz LLP is a direct competitor to Rosen Law Firm, with both firms frequently vying to represent shareholders as le
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ Robbins LLP
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ DJS Law Group
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ Levi & Korsinsky
+ 21 more relationships View on Dashboard
ERGEN INTELLIGENCE
Track this event live

Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.

Open Dashboard

About Ergen

Ergen is a news intelligence platform that converts raw news articles into structured data. It tracks events, entities, and the relationships between them, with sentiment and attention metrics derived from thousands of articles. Pages on this site are daily static snapshots from the platform's live database. For real-time tracking, search, and alerts, the full dashboard is at app.ergen.ai.