SC bars banks from Caution List for lawyers
Analysis based on 7 articles · First reported Jul 07, 2026 · Last updated Jul 08, 2026
The ruling limits banks' ability to blacklist lawyers, potentially increasing legal costs for banks if they must pursue disciplinary action through Bar Councils. It may also reduce the deterrent effect of the Caution List on legal professionals, but clarifies regulatory boundaries.
The India — Supreme Court of India ruled that banks and the Indian Banks Association cannot include advocates in the Caution List based solely on allegations of professional negligence, as disciplinary authority lies exclusively with Bar Councils under the Advocates Act. The court allowed advocate Ajay Vijh's appeal, ordering his name's immediate removal from the list after Canara Bank flagged an erroneous legal opinion. It clarified that the Caution List is intended for fraud cases, not for assessing legal professionals' competence. The court also directed the India — Bar Council of India to conduct a performance audit of disciplinary mechanisms and establish Continuing Legal Education for advocates.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard