Delhi High Court questions Meta Rights Manager access
Analysis based on 18 articles · First reported Aug 12, 2026 · Last updated Aug 12, 2026
The case highlights regulatory scrutiny over Meta's content moderation and copyright tools, potentially affecting its operational practices and legal exposure in India. While the immediate financial impact is limited, adverse rulings could lead to increased compliance costs and reputational damage.
The India — Delhi High Court, presided by Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani, heard a suit filed by content creator Raj Kumar Goyal against Meta Platforms. Kumar alleged that scammers downloaded his original videos, registered them with Meta's Rights Manager tool, and used it to issue fraudulent copyright strikes against his accounts, while his own repeated applications for access to the tool were rejected without clear reasons. The court questioned Meta's eligibility criteria for granting access to Rights Manager, remarking that it was 'like giving the key to the robber and not to the owner of the house.' Meta informed the court that the disputed strikes had been reversed and content restored, and that Kumar's accounts were never suspended. Meta agreed to disclose its policy and eligibility criteria and to reconsider Kumar's application. The court issued summons and listed the matter for September 24, also noting similar concerns in other cases, including one by content creator Saurabh Maurya, whose Meta Platforms — Instagram account was suspended following a false copyright strike.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard