Justice Bhuyan Advocates Distinguished Jurist Appointments
Analysis based on 6 articles · First reported Aug 30, 2026 · Last updated Aug 31, 2026
This is a domestic judicial policy discussion with minimal direct market impact. It may influence legal education and judicial appointment processes in India over the long term.
India — Supreme Court of India judge Ujjal Bhuyan, speaking at the 13th convocation of National Law University, Delhi, advocated for the appointment of distinguished jurists to the Supreme Court under Article 124(3)(c) of the Constitution. He lamented that in 76 years, no legal academic has been appointed, calling it an 'unused mandate'. He dismissed objections about lack of practical experience as 'shallow', citing examples from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Kenya, and mentioned Felix Frankfurter and Samuel Miller as US examples. He emphasized that such appointments would diversify the bench and enhance decision-making.
Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.
Open Dashboard