United States — Federal Reserve & United States — Federal Trade Commission

United States — Federal Reserve: The United States — Federal Reserve's independence was largely preserved by the United States — Supreme Court of the United States' ruling, which carved out an exception for its governors from the expanded presidential firing powers. This is crucial for its ability to set monetary policy free from political interference.

United States — Federal Trade Commission: The United States — Federal Trade Commission lost its protection from at-will presidential firings, as the United States — Supreme Court of the United States overturned a 90-year-old precedent. This subjects its leadership to greater political influence.

United States — Federal Reserve: The United States — Federal Reserve maintained its independence from presidential influence as the Supreme Court upheld the tenure of its governor, Lisa Cook, against Donald Trump's attempt to fire her.

United States — Federal Trade Commission: The United States — Federal Trade Commission saw its leaders' tenure protections invalidated by a Supreme Court ruling, expanding presidential power over regulatory agencies.

United States — Federal Reserve: The United States — Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the United States — Federal Reserve has a measure of independence from the presidency, protecting its structure from political interference.

United States — Federal Trade Commission: The United States — Federal Trade Commission is mentioned as an agency whose leaders the president can fire at-will, in contrast to the United States — Federal Reserve.