India — Supreme Court of India & Manan Kumar Mishra

India — Supreme Court of India: The Supreme Court intervened to protect students' rights and rebuke the BCI, reinforcing its role as guardian of fundamental rights. It issued notice to the BCI and restrained punitive actions, shaping the legal outcome.

Manan Kumar Mishra: As BCI chairman, Mishra issued the controversial enrolment ban and later apologised after backlash. His leadership faced criticism and calls for resignation, but he avoided formal consequences.

India — Supreme Court of India: The Supreme Court criticized the BCI's intervention and protected students' rights, reinforcing its role as a guardian of constitutional values.

Manan Kumar Mishra: Mishra faces resignation demands from the BCI co-chair and protests; he denies allegations and refuses to step down, but his position is severely weakened.

India — Supreme Court of India: The Supreme Court criticized the BCI's action and supported students' right to protest, reinforcing its role as a guardian of constitutional rights. This may enhance its institutional credibility.

Manan Kumar Mishra: The BCI Chairman issued the controversial enrolment ban, which was later withdrawn. He faces demands for an apology and accountability, and his dual role as a BJP MP raises concerns about political influence.

India — Supreme Court of India: The Supreme Court is the central judicial authority hearing the plea and issuing notices to multiple parties, thereby shaping the legal process.

Manan Kumar Mishra: Senior advocate representing the petitioner, presenting arguments before the Supreme Court.