United States — United States Department of Justice & United States — Democratic National Committee

United States — United States Department of Justice: The DOJ's emergency request was granted, allowing it to proceed with implementing the executive order, including prioritizing prosecutions of election officials.

United States — Democratic National Committee: Challenged the order in a separate lawsuit.

United States — United States Department of Justice: DOJ prosecuted Cole and argued against the pardon's applicability.

United States — Democratic National Committee: One of the locations where Cole allegedly planted pipe bombs.

United States — United States Department of Justice: The United States — United States Department of Justice represented the federal government in court, arguing that Donald Trump's executive order had not yet been implemented, which was a key factor in Judge Carl J. Nichols' decision.

United States — Democratic National Committee: The United States — Democratic National Committee is among the plaintiffs who argued for an immediate restraining order against Donald Trump's executive order, citing potential confusion for midterm elections.

United States — United States Department of Justice: The United States — United States Department of Justice defended Donald Trump's executive orders in court, arguing against the lawsuits challenging their constitutionality, but faced setbacks in judicial rulings.

United States — Democratic National Committee: The United States — Democratic National Committee challenged Donald Trump's executive order, arguing it was invalid, and their position was supported by Judge Indira Talwani's ruling.

United States — United States Department of Justice: Consent decree from 2019 continued under Snelling's leadership.

United States — Democratic National Committee: 2024 convention held in Chicago under Snelling's security oversight.