American Civil Liberties Union & Elena Kagan

American Civil Liberties Union: The American Civil Liberties Union successfully challenged Donald Trump's executive order, with their National Legal Director Cecillia Wang arguing the case before the United States — Supreme Court of the United States.

Elena Kagan: Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion, upholding birthright citizenship.

American Civil Liberties Union: The ACLU represents voting rights groups challenging the executive order. Its involvement is significant in the legal battle, and a favorable ruling would support its advocacy.

Elena Kagan: Kagan joined Sotomayor's dissent, opposing the majority's decision.

American Civil Liberties Union: The American Civil Liberties Union's Voting Rights Project, through Sophia Lin Lakin, warned that the Supreme Court's ruling will allow states to justify maps that strip voters of color of representation.

Elena Kagan: Elena Kagan, a liberal judge on the United States — Supreme Court of the United States, wrote a dissenting opinion stating the decision renders Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 'all but a dead letter'.

American Civil Liberties Union: The American Civil Liberties Union, also representing plaintiffs, called the ruling a 'stain' on the court for ignoring the role of race.

Elena Kagan: Justice Elena Kagan dissented in the temporary protected status case, arguing that Donald Trump's references were 'shot through with racial stereotypes,' and also in the voting rights case, warning of 'far-reaching and grave' consequences.

American Civil Liberties Union: The American Civil Liberties Union>>> released a statement on behalf of the plaintiffs, asserting that United States — Alabama>>>'s attempt to reinstate a race-based congressional map was seen through by the court.

Elena Kagan: Elena Kagan>>>, a justice on the United States — Supreme Court of the United States>>>, joined Justice Sonia Sotomayor>>>'s dissent against the majority's decision.