Abhishek Singhvi & Joymalya Bagchi

Abhishek Singhvi: Abhishek Singhvi, counsel for the petitioner states, argued that the India — Election Commission of India does not have the power to introduce a citizenship test through executive innovation.

Joymalya Bagchi: Joymalya Bagchi was part of the India — Supreme Court of India bench that heard the petitions regarding the extension of the SIR deadline.

Abhishek Singhvi: Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi urged the court to clarify the meaning of 'criminal antecedents' to protect students with minor offences.

Joymalya Bagchi: Justice Joymalya Bagchi was part of the bench that issued the ruling.

Abhishek Singhvi: Abhishek Singhvi, a senior advocate, joined Kapil Sibal in bringing the controversial textbook content to the attention of the India — Supreme Court of India, emphasizing the selective nature of the corruption discussion.

Joymalya Bagchi: Joymalya Bagchi, a Justice on the India — Supreme Court of India bench, indicated that the textbook's mention of judicial corruption affected constitutional integrity and the principle of separation of powers.

Abhishek Singhvi: Senior advocate representing the Muslim side.

Joymalya Bagchi: Part of the Supreme Court bench hearing the case.

Abhishek Singhvi: Senior counsel who pointed out the amendment's impact on self-determination.

Joymalya Bagchi: Justice on the bench who expressed concern for transgender rights.

Abhishek Singhvi: Senior advocate Abhishek Singhvi appeared for Anita Bose Pfaff in the Supreme Court proceedings.

Joymalya Bagchi: Justice Joymalya Bagchi was part of the bench that heard the plea.

Abhishek Singhvi: Senior advocate who also sought relief for Singh.

Joymalya Bagchi: Justice on the bench.