Clarence Thomas & D. John Sauer

Clarence Thomas: Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion, arguing that Donald Trump's order should have been upheld and that the 14th Amendment was being repurposed for political projects not supported by the Reconstruction Congress.

D. John Sauer: D. John Sauer, representing the Trump administration, argued against birthright citizenship before the United States — Supreme Court of the United States, citing concerns about 'birth tourism'.

Clarence Thomas: Justice Clarence Thomas joined the majority opinion and filed a concurring opinion, arguing that FIFRA itself was 'likely unconstitutional in many applications' due to exceeding Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.

D. John Sauer: Current U.S. Solicitor General who sided with Bayer — Monsanto in the case.

Clarence Thomas: Justice Thomas dissented in Cook, arguing that any protection against Trump firing Cook is unconstitutional.

D. John Sauer: Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued on behalf of the Trump administration, advocating for an expansive view of presidential power to remove agency heads.

Clarence Thomas: Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in the birthright citizenship case, arguing that African descendants of enslaved people are a unique case separate from children of tourists or undocumented immigrants.

D. John Sauer: U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued before the United States — Supreme Court of the United States that the birthright citizenship clause does not extend to children of temporary visa holders or undocumented immigrants.

Clarence Thomas: Justice Clarence Thomas dissented from the United States — Supreme Court of the United States's decision, siding with Donald Trump's administration regarding the United States — National Guard (United States) deployment.

D. John Sauer: Solicitor General D. John Sauer claimed federal agents in United States — Chicago faced a 'constant threat of mob violence' in his emergency appeal to the United States — Supreme Court of the United States.