Clarence Thomas & Elena Kagan

Clarence Thomas: Clarence Thomas wrote a dissenting opinion, arguing that Donald Trump's order should have been upheld and that the 14th Amendment was being repurposed for political projects not supported by the Reconstruction Congress.

Elena Kagan: Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion, upholding birthright citizenship.

Clarence Thomas: Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in the birthright citizenship case, arguing that African descendants of enslaved people are a unique case separate from children of tourists or undocumented immigrants.

Elena Kagan: Justice Elena Kagan dissented in the temporary protected status case, arguing that Donald Trump's references were 'shot through with racial stereotypes,' and also in the voting rights case, warning of 'far-reaching and grave' consequences.

Clarence Thomas: Justice Clarence Thomas joined the majority opinion and filed a concurring opinion, arguing that FIFRA itself was 'likely unconstitutional in many applications' due to exceeding Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.

Elena Kagan: Justice Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion, supporting the Supreme Court's decision to restrict state-level lawsuits against pesticide manufacturers.

Clarence Thomas: Clarence Thomas was one of the three dissenting justices in the Supreme Court's ruling, supporting Donald Trump's interpretation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Elena Kagan: Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion of the United States — Supreme Court of the United States, ruling against Donald Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for tariffs.