Snapshot from Aug 24, 2026 at 07:00 UTC. For live data and tracking: View Live
Events / Regulatory / ZoomInfo Securities Class Action Lawsuit
Regulatory class action

ZoomInfo Securities Class Action Lawsuit

Analysis based on 232 articles · First reported Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Aug 20, 2026

Sentiment
-40
Attention
3
Articles
232
Market Impact
General
Live prominence charts, article sentiment distribution, and event development timeline available on the Ergen Dashboard
Market Impact

The class action lawsuit adds legal risk and negative sentiment for ZoomInfo, potentially further depressing its stock price. The allegations of misleading guidance may erode investor confidence in the company's management and growth narrative.

Software Technology
Event Summary

Multiple law firms have filed securities class action lawsuits against ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ: GTM) alleging that the company made materially false and misleading statements regarding its business fundamentals and growth prospects between November 3, 2025 and May 11, 2026. The complaints claim that ZoomInfo failed to disclose slowing seat-based demand, weakening upsell opportunities, and customer migration to consumption-based models and internal AI solutions. On May 11, 2026, ZoomInfo reported Q1 2026 results and slashed its full-year revenue guidance by approximately $62 million, causing its stock price to drop 33% from $6.04 to $4.06 per share. Investors have until August 24, 2026 to seek lead plaintiff status.

Key Actions
100 Robbins LLP filed class action General Atomics
98 Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC filed class action lawsuit ZoomInfo
95 ZoomInfo reported financial results
95 Pomerantz LLP investigated claims ZoomInfo
95 Levi & Korsinsky filed class action ZoomInfo
95 Schall Brown & Schwartz LLP filed class action ZoomInfo
90 The Schall Law Firm reminded investors of lawsuit ZoomInfo
90 General Atomics misled investors
90 Faruqi & Faruqi investigating claims against General Atomics
85 Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer filed class action lawsuit ZoomInfo
84 ZoomInfo made misleading statements
80 DJS Law Group filed class action ZoomInfo
80 Glancy Prongay & Murray filed securities fraud class action ZoomInfo
80 General Atomics announced financial results
75 The Law Offices of Frank R. Cruz filed class action lawsuit ZoomInfo
+ 3 more actions View on Dashboard
Entities Involved
priv
ZoomInfo
ZoomInfo is the defendant in the securities class action, facing allegations of misleading investors about its business health. The stock dropped 33% after the guidance cut, and the lawsuit may lead to financial damages and reputational harm.
Importance 100.0 Sentiment -60.0
per
Henry Schuck
Henry Schuck is the CEO of ZoomInfo. He is named as a defendant in the class action lawsuits for allegedly making misleading statements about the company's growth and AI product adoption.
Importance 50.0 Sentiment -70.0
priv
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer is a law firm that filed a class action lawsuit against ZoomInfo, representing investors.
Importance 30.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is one of the law firms that filed the class action against ZoomInfo, representing investors on a contingency basis.
Importance 30.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
Pomerantz LLP
Pomerantz LLP filed a class action against ZoomInfo, alleging securities fraud and unlawful business practices.
Importance 20.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
The Schall Law Firm
The The Schall Law Firm is another firm that filed a class action against ZoomInfo, reminding investors of the lead plaintiff deadline.
Importance 20.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
DJS Law Group
DJS Law Group reminded investors of the class action against ZoomInfo and the lead plaintiff deadline.
Importance 15.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Pamela A. Mayer
Pamela A. Mayer is an attorney at Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer involved in the ZoomInfo class action.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Laurence D. King
Laurence D. King is an attorney at Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer involved in the ZoomInfo class action.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
govactor
United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission
The SEC is referenced as the regulatory body under whose rules the securities fraud claims are brought, but is not a party to the lawsuit.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Peretz Bronstein
Peretz Bronstein is the founding partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC and is involved in the ZoomInfo class action as a contact for investors.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Nathan Miller
Nathan Miller is a client relations manager at Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, assisting with investor inquiries regarding the ZoomInfo lawsuit.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Danielle Peyton
Danielle Peyton is the contact at Pomerantz LLP for investors seeking to join the ZoomInfo class action.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Brian Schall
Brian Schall is the contact attorney at the The Schall Law Firm for the ZoomInfo class action.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
David Schwartz (disambiguation)
David Schwartz (disambiguation) is the contact attorney at DJS Law Group for the ZoomInfo class action.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
Relationships
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer co-plaintiffs ↔ Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer frequently acts as a co-plaintiff with Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC in various securities
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer related ↔ Pomerantz LLP
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer related ↔ The Schall Law Firm
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer co-plaintiff ↔ DJS Law Group Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer frequently collaborates with DJS Law Group as co-counsel in securities class action lawsuits, re
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer related ↔ Pamela A. Mayer
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer related ↔ Laurence D. King
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer related ↔ United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC co-plaintiffs ↔ Pomerantz LLP Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC frequently collaborates with Pomerantz LLP as co-plaintiffs in numerous class action
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC co-counsel ↔ The Schall Law Firm Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC frequently collaborates with The Schall Law Firm as co-counsel in numerous securities
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC co-plaintiffs ↔ DJS Law Group Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC frequently acts as a co-plaintiff with DJS Law Group in numerous securities fraud cla
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC securities litigator ↔ United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC is a law firm whose business model relies on the federal securities laws and regulati
Pomerantz LLP competitor ↔ The Schall Law Firm Pomerantz LLP competes directly with The Schall Law Firm to secure lead plaintiff and counsel status in securities fraud
Pomerantz LLP co-counsel ↔ DJS Law Group Pomerantz LLP often collaborates with DJS Law Group as co-counsel in numerous securities fraud class action lawsuits, wo
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission
The Schall Law Firm affiliate ↔ DJS Law Group The Schall Law Firm is affiliated with DJS Law Group, sharing founding partner David J. Schwartz and issuing joint press
+ 3 more relationships View on Dashboard
ERGEN INTELLIGENCE
Track this event live

Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.

Open Dashboard

About Ergen

Ergen is a news intelligence platform that converts raw news articles into structured data. It tracks events, entities, and the relationships between them, with sentiment and attention metrics derived from thousands of articles. Pages on this site are daily static snapshots from the platform's live database. For real-time tracking, search, and alerts, the full dashboard is at app.ergen.ai.