Snapshot from Aug 24, 2026 at 07:00 UTC. For live data and tracking: View Live
Events / Regulatory / Insulet Securities Fraud Class Action
Regulatory class action

Insulet Securities Fraud Class Action

Analysis based on 301 articles · First reported Jul 02, 2026 · Last updated Aug 19, 2026

Sentiment
-40
Attention
3
Articles
301
Market Impact
General
Live prominence charts, article sentiment distribution, and event development timeline available on the Ergen Dashboard
Market Impact

Insulet's stock price fell significantly upon disclosure of manufacturing issues, erasing billions in market value. The class action lawsuits may result in substantial financial liability for the company and further erode investor confidence.

Medical Devices Healthcare
Event Summary

Multiple law firms have filed securities fraud class action lawsuits against Insulet Corporation (NASDAQ: PODD) on behalf of investors who purchased Insulet securities between February 21, 2025 and May 26, 2026. The lawsuits allege that Insulet made false and misleading statements regarding its manufacturing controls and procedures, which were defective and created a risk that its products would violate safety regulations or cause injury. The truth emerged on March 12, 2026, when Insulet announced a voluntary Medical Device Correction for Omnipod 5 Pods due to a manufacturing issue, causing its stock to drop 6.9%. On May 26, 2026, Insulet announced another correction for multiple Omnipod products, causing a further 5.1% decline. Investors have until August 31, 2026 to seek lead plaintiff status. The case is pending in the United States — United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Key Actions
100 Pomerantz LLP filed class action lawsuit Insulet Corporation
100 Schall Brown & Schwartz LLP filed class action Insulet Corporation
100 DJS Law Group filed class action Insulet Corporation
100 Kirby McInerney LLP filed securities fraud lawsuit Insulet Corporation
95 Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC filed class action Insulet Corporation
92 Robbins LLP filed class action lawsuit Oracle Corporation
90 Insulet Corporation disclosed manufacturing issue
90 Oracle Corporation initiated Medical Device Correction
88 Rosen Law Firm filed class action Insulet Corporation
86 Levi & Korsinsky filed securities class action Insulet Corporation
80 The Schall Law Firm filed class action Insulet Corporation
80 Faruqi & Faruqi filed securities class action Insulet Corporation
80 Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP filed class action Insulet Corporation
65 Glancy Prongay & Murray filed securities fraud lawsuit Insulet Corporation
62 BTIG cut price target Insulet Corporation
+ 9 more actions View on Dashboard
Entities Involved
stock
Insulet Corporation
Defendant in securities fraud class action; alleged defective manufacturing controls led to product corrections and stock price declines.
Importance 100.0 Sentiment -60.0
priv
Rosen Law Firm
Filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Insulet investors; encourages investors to join.
Importance 20.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
Pomerantz LLP
Filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Insulet investors; provides case details including stock price drops.
Importance 20.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Insulet investors; encourages investors to join.
Importance 20.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
Glancy Prongay & Murray
Encourages Insulet shareholders to inquire about securities fraud class action.
Importance 15.0 Sentiment 0.0
priv
The Schall Law Firm
Reminds investors of class action lawsuit against Insulet; alleges defective manufacturing controls.
Importance 15.0 Sentiment 0.0
exch
Nasdaq
Nasdaq is the stock exchange where Insulet's shares (PODD) are traded.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
cnt
United States
The United States is the jurisdiction where the lawsuit was filed and where Insulet operates.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
govactor
United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Regulatory body; the lawsuit alleges violations of SEC rules.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
govactor
United States — United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Court where the class action lawsuit is filed.
Importance 10.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Lawrence Rosen
Founding partner of Rosen Law Firm; mentioned as contact for the class action.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Philip Kim
Attorney at Rosen Law Firm; contact for investors wishing to join the class action.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Charles Linehan
Attorney at Glancy Prongay & Murray; contact for investors.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Danielle Peyton
Contact at Pomerantz LLP for investors inquiring about the class action.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
per
Peretz Bronstein
Founding partner of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC; contact for investors.
Importance 5.0 Sentiment 0.0
+ 2 more entities View on Dashboard
Relationships
Rosen Law Firm co-plaintiff ↔ Pomerantz LLP Rosen Law Firm frequently acts as a co-plaintiff with Pomerantz LLP in numerous investor-rights class action lawsuits ag
Rosen Law Firm co-counsel ↔ Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Rosen Law Firm frequently collaborates with Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC as co-counsel on investor-rights class ac
Rosen Law Firm co-plaintiff ↔ Glancy Prongay & Murray Rosen Law Firm frequently acts as co-counsel with Glancy Prongay & Murray in numerous securities class action lawsuits,
Rosen Law Firm co-plaintiffs ↔ The Schall Law Firm Rosen Law Firm frequently acts as co-plaintiff with The Schall Law Firm in various securities class action lawsuits agai
Rosen Law Firm related ↔ Nasdaq
Rosen Law Firm related ↔ United States
Rosen Law Firm securities litigator ↔ United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission Rosen Law Firm is a global investor rights law firm specializing in filing class action lawsuits against companies for a
Rosen Law Firm related ↔ United States — United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Pomerantz LLP co-plaintiffs ↔ Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC Pomerantz LLP frequently collaborates with Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC as co-plaintiffs in numerous class action
Pomerantz LLP co-counsel ↔ Glancy Prongay & Murray Pomerantz LLP frequently acts as co-counsel with Glancy Prongay & Murray in numerous securities fraud class action lawsu
Pomerantz LLP competitor ↔ The Schall Law Firm Pomerantz LLP competes directly with The Schall Law Firm to secure lead plaintiff and counsel status in securities fraud
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ Nasdaq
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ United States
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ United States — United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Pomerantz LLP related ↔ United States — United States District Court for the Northern District of California
+ 21 more relationships View on Dashboard
ERGEN INTELLIGENCE
Track this event live

Set up alerts, explore entity relationships, search across thousands of events, and build custom intelligence feeds.

Open Dashboard

About Ergen

Ergen is a news intelligence platform that converts raw news articles into structured data. It tracks events, entities, and the relationships between them, with sentiment and attention metrics derived from thousands of articles. Pages on this site are daily static snapshots from the platform's live database. For real-time tracking, search, and alerts, the full dashboard is at app.ergen.ai.